UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 25, 2009
LAMARR RASHID CROWDER, PETITIONER,
JAMES E. TILTON, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
On May 18, 2009, this Court entered judgment denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought by Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 16, 2009, Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal and an Application for Certificate of Appealability. A certificate of appealability is authorized "if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). "A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). See also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Having reviewed the Petition, the R&R and the May 18, 2009 Order denying the Petition, the Court finds Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find this Court's dismissal of his petition debatable. Therefore, the Court denies Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.