JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 06 23 09
X WITH COUNSEL Kay Otani, DFPD
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Count 1:Title 18, United States Code, Section 371: Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government; Counts 31, 32 & 33: Willful Filing False Income Tax Return of the First Superseding Indictment.
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Matthew Carl Berry, is hereby committed on count One of the Superseding Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of Sixty (60) months; as to counts 31, 32, and 33 of the Superseding Indictment, Matthew Carl Berry, is committed to a term of Sixteen (16) months each count to run consecutively to each other and to count 1, for a total of One hundred eight (108) months.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years. This term consists of three years on Count 1, and one year on each of Counts 31, 32, and 33 of the First Superseding Indictment, all such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall truthfully and timely file and pay taxes owed for the years of conviction; and shall truthfully and timely file and pay taxes during the period of community supervision. Further, the defendant shall show proof to the Probation Officer of compliance with this order;
The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner, consultant, volunteer, employee or otherwise, in any business involving the preparation of income tax returns or financial consultation without the express approval of the Probation Officer prior to engagement in such employment. Further, the defendant shall provide the Probation Officer with access to any and all business records, client lists and other records pertaining to the operation of any business owned, in whole or in part, by the defendant, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not be employed in any position that requires licensing and/or certification by any local, state or federal agency without prior approval of the Probation Officer; and
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $400, which is due
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, in the amount of $31,789,067. The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid to the Internal Revenue Service.
Restitution shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $5,400 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the restitution remains unpaid after release from custody, nominal monthly payments of at least $300 shall be made during the period of supervised release. These payments shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment of the amount ordered.
The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with co-defendants, Carla Denine, Karen Denise Berry, Ivan Johnson, and Valerie Dixon for the amount of restitution ordered in this judgment.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(g).
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
The Court recommends to the Bureau of Prisons that the defendant be designated to a FCI ...