UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 25, 2009
WORDTECH SYSTEMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. A NEVADA CORPORATION CORP. DBA INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS CORP. AKA INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS AKA INTEGRATED SYSTEMS AKA INTERNET NETWORK STORAGE COMPANY, AKA INSC; NASSER KHATEMI, AN INDIVIDUAL, HAMID ASSADIAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, EHTERAM GHODSIAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, SHOHREH JAVADI, AN INDIVIDUAL, MICHAEL F. ELLSWORTH, AN INDIVIDUAL; BRIAN J. DEAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; AND DOES 1 -- 50, DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge
STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS; ORDER (L.R. 83-182(b))
___________________________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION ___________________________________________
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS
Defendants HAMID ASSADIAN, NASSER KHATEMI and INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS CORP. desire to substitute attorneys for the purposes of proceeding with an appeal in this action. Defendants ASSADIAN and KHATEMI hereby withdraw the previous proposed Substitutions of Attorneys filed on their behalf.
The new attorney is:
Michael E. Chase BOUTIN GIBSON DI GIUSTO HODELL INC. 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel.: (916) 321-4444 Fax: (916) 441-7597 email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Defendant ASSADIAN consents to this substitution:
Defendant KHATEMI consents to this substitution:
Defendant INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS CORP. consents to this substitution:
INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS CORP.
By: ___/s/______________________ Its: _________________________
Withdrawing attorney Daniel L. Richardson consents to this substitution:
New attorney Michael E. Chase consents to this substitution:
Given the above stipulation for Substitution of Attorneys, Attorney Michael E. Chase is substituted in as counsel for Defendants in the stead of Attorney Daniel L. Richardson, who formerly represented Defendants and is hereby discharged of said representation. Given this substitution, and the withdrawal of the previous substitution requests submitted to the Court for purposes of designating Defendants Khatemi and Assadian as representing themselves in pro se, Defendant Assadian's Motion for Relief from Judgment filed June 19, 2009 (Docket No. 293) is stricken from the Docket as improper. No further action will be taken by the Court with respect to that Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.