Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Miranda v. Swift Transportation Co.
June 25, 2009
ROSE MIRANDA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
Plaintiff's "Substitution of Attorney and (Proposed) Order" filed June 8, 2009, fails to comply with requirement in the applicable Local Rule and is therefore stricken.
Further, Plaintiff's "Stipulation for Continuance of Trial, Discovery, and Motion Dates" filed on June 18, 2009, assumes Plaintiff is proceeding in pro per when she is still represented by counsel. Therefore, this stipulation is also stricken.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...