Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Felix v. Martel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 26, 2009

EDDIE FELIX, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL MARTEL, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On January 5, 2009, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. Docket # 9. By order filed March 5, 2009 (# 10), the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. In the March 5th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. On March 30, 2009 (# 14), plaintiff was granted a sixty-day extension of time to file his amended complaint. The sixty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the March 5, 2009 order,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20090626

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.