Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ahmad v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 26, 2009

NADEEM AHMAD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed and served by mail on May 20, 2009, plaintiff's pro se complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint that cures the defects noted in the order and complies with applicable rules. Plaintiff was granted thirty days from the date of the order to file the amended complaint and was cautioned that failure to respond to the order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order in any manner.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. A document containing any objections should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20090626

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.