UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 30, 2009
MICHAEL MAURICE MCMAHILL, PLAINTIFF,
CMO DR. T. BZOSKIE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: A. Howard Matz United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is approved and adopted; (2) the Second Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend, and with prejudice, as against Defendants Olukanmi, Swaby and Bzoskie; (3) the claim for injunctive relief in the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend, but without prejudice; (4) the Second Amended Complaint otherwise is dismissed with leave to amend; and (5) Plaintiff's motion for transfer is denied. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within which to file a Third Amended Complaint. Any Third Amended Complaint shall be complete in itself. Any Third Amended Complaint shall not seek injunctive relief. Any Third Amended Complaint shall not name as Defendants Olukanmi, Swaby or Bzoskie. Plaintiff should not attempt to add additional defendants without leave of Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. Failure timely to file a Third Amended Complaint may result in dismissal of the action.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.