Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Craver v. National City Bank

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 2, 2009

CONSTANCE CRAVER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NATIONAL CITY BANK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action to quiet title. Pending before the court is Defendant's motion to strike and motion to dismiss, on calendar for oral argument on July 9, 2009. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to either motion.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, any opposition "to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed with the Clerk not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date." See Local Rule 78-230(c). The local rules further provide that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." Id.

Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(h), the hearing scheduled for July 9, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matters are submitted on the record and briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090702

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.