Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Solano

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 6, 2009

DOUGLAS WHITE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CSP SOLANO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On October 17, 2008, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #4). By order filed January 29, 2009, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. In the January 29th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the January 29, 2009, order,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20090706

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.