UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
July 9, 2009
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, PLAINTIFF,
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON SEAGATE'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM NATIONAL UNION [Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12]
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, plaintiff Seagate Technology LLC ("Seagate") and defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National Union") file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order continuing the hearing date on Seagate's motion to compel the production of documents and discovery responses from National Union.
On July 1, 2009, Seagate filed a motion to compel the production of documents and discovery responses from National Union. See Docket Item No. 157. July 1, 2009 was the deadline to file motions to compel under the Court's Scheduling Order and Civil L.R. 26-2. See Docket Item No. 72; Civil L.R. 26-2. Seagate set the motion to be heard on August 11, 2009.
See Docket Item No. 157. National Union's has filed a motion to extend time to respond to interrogatories and request for production of documents pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6(b) and for relief from inadvertent waiver. See Docket Item No. 156. That motion is currently scheduled to be heard on August 18, 2009. Id.
On July 2, 2009, National Union's informed Seagate that because of conflicts, National Union's counsel will not be available on August 11, 2009, and asked Seagate to stipulate to continue the hearing to August 18, 2009. Seagate did not object to continuing the hearing by one week. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to continuing the hearing date on Seagate's motion to compel from August 11, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. to August 18, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The parties further stipulate to file all moving papers according to the schedule established by the Court's Local Rules.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 8, 2009
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.