Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hewitt v. Zurich American Insurance Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 9, 2009

MATT HEWITT AND PACIFIC CREST RESEARCH CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS
v.
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE GROUP, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION; AND MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION DEFENDANT(S).

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez Judge of the Eastern District Court

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in the above-entitled case, through their counsel of record, that this matter is dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant the Proposed Order and dismiss this matter with prejudice.

Dated: June 8, 2009

ORDER

Good cause being shown therefore, it is so Ordered.

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the City and County of Sacramento, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 600, Sacramento, CA 95814.

On this date, the following document(s):

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON was served on all parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

Jay E. Framson Jonathan Gross Bishop, Barry, Howe, Haney & Ryder 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1425 Emeryville, California 94608

Service was accomplished by:

MAIL -- I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing documents and correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the envelope would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on today's date with postage thereon fully prepaid at Sacramento, California in the ordinary course of business.

PERSONAL SERVICE -- I am readily familiar with this firm's practice regarding the use of courier services. Under that practice, the courier service would dispatch a courier to this firm to pick-up and personally deliver the document(s) by close of business on today's date to the above addressee(s).

OVERNIGHT DELIVERY -- I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for shipping via overnight delivery service. Under that practice it would be deposited in an overnight delivery service pick-up box or office on the same day with fees thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business.

FACSIMILE -- At or about __________ a.m./p.m. on, I transmitted the document(s) to the facsimile number(s) of the above addressee(s) This document was transmitted by using a facsimile machine that complies with California Rules of Court Rule 2003(3), telephone number 916-446-3606. The transmission was reported as complete and without error. A copy of the transmission report, properly issued by the transmitting machine, is attached.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.

Executed on July 8, 2009 in Sacramento, California.

Natalia D. Asbill

20090709

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.