Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Richardson v. Bryant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 10, 2009

PATRICK RICHARDSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
H. L. BRYANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO NOTIFY THE COURT RE WHETHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL (Doc. 117.) DEADLINE JULY 27, 2009

Plaintiff Patrick Richardson ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed July 3, 2007, against only Defendant Captain D. Ortiz ("Defendant") for denial of Plaintiff's access to the courts. (Doc. 85.)

On May 28, 2009, Defendant filed a request for an extension of time to comply with the Court's order of May 20, 2009, which required the parties to notify the Court within thirty days whether a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas would be beneficial in this case. (Doc. 117.) Good cause having been presented to the Court, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for extension of time is GRANTED; and

2. Defendant shall notify the Court in writing, on or before July 27, 2009, whether a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas would be beneficial in this case, pursuant to the Court's order of May 20, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090710

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.