Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Jaspar v. Knowles
July 13, 2009
MATTHEW LEE JASPAR, PETITIONER,
v.
MIKE KNOWLES, WARDEN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
On March 30, 2009, the court determined that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is successive under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) and dismissed the petition without prejudice to refiling upon obtaining the necessary authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner now asks that the court transfer this action to the Ninth Circuit so that he may obtain the necessary authorization. However, transfer is not necessary or warranted because petitioner may file his request for authorization with the Ninth Circuit by himself. Therefore, petitioner's request for transfer (#15) is denied.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...