Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Artful Dodger, LLC v. Oakland Family Outlet

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 14, 2009

ARTFUL DODGER, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; BESTFORD USA INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION DBA EVISU; AND CHRISTIAN CASEY LLC, A NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION DBA SEAN JOHN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
OAKLAND FAMILY OUTLET, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY; KIL CHA LEE, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION; VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs Artful Dodger LLC, Bestford USA Inc., dba Evisu, and Christian Casey LLC dba Sean John (hereinafter collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Oakland Family Outlet and Kil Cha Lee aka Cindy Lee (hereinafter collectively "Defendants") have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to the 23 claims in the above referenced matter. Defendants, having agreed to consent to the 24 below terms, it is hereby:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as among the parties hereto that:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Final Judgment and has jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121.

2. Plaintiffs have alleged that Defendants' purchase and sale of apparel falsely bearing Plaintiffs' Respective Trademarks constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. and under the common law.

3. Defendants and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with it who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon Plaintiffs' Respective Trademarks, either directly or contributorily, in any manner, including generally, but not limited to manufacturing, importing, distributing, advertising, selling and/or offering for sale any unauthorized product bearing Plaintiffs' Respective Trademarks, or marks confusingly similar to or constituting a colorable imitation thereof, and, specifically from:

(a) using Plaintiffs' Respective Trademarks or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of same in connection with the manufacture, importation, distribution, advertisement, offer for sale and/or sale of merchandise comprising not the genuine products of Plaintiffs, or in any manner likely to cause others to believe that the counterfeit products are connected with Plaintiffs or

(b) passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any products or other items that are not Plaintiffs' genuine merchandise as and for that Defendant's products are Plaintiffs' genuine merchandise unless they are such; and

(c) committing any other acts calculated to cause purchasers to believe transferring or otherwise moving, storing or disposing of in any manner items falsely bearing Plaintiffs' Respective Trademarks, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of same.

(d) shipping, delivering, holding for sale, distributing, returning, Plaintiffs' genuine merchandise; Plaintiffs' genuine merchandise;

4. Plaintiffs and Defendants shall bear their own costs associated with this action.

5. The execution of this Final Judgment by Counsel for the parties shall serve to bind and obligate the parties hereto.

6. The jurisdiction of this Court is retained for the purpose of making any further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this Final Judgment, the enforcement thereof and the punishment of any violations thereof.

Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice.

7. This Final Judgment shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090714

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.