Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Aragonez v. County of San Bernardino

July 17, 2009

DAVID ARAGONEZ AND SALVADOR LOZANO PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Robert J. Timlin United States District Judge

Judgment

The jury having returned a special verdict on June 17, 2009 (Hon Robert J. Timlin, presiding), and pursuant also to the prior orders for partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants Alvin Huff and Peter Recatto on November 18, 2008 (Hon. Virginia Phillips, presiding), it is ordered and adjudged as follows:

1. On Plaintiff Salvador Lozano's claim for relief against Defendant Alvin Huff for unlawful detention in deprivation of Plaintiff Lozano's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Alvin Huff and against Plaintiff Salvador Lozano.

2. On Plaintiff David Aragonez's claim for relief against Defendant Alvin Huff for unlawful detention in deprivation of Plaintiff Aragonez's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Alvin Huff and against Plaintiff David Aragonez.

3. On Plaintiff Salvador Lozano's claim for relief against Defendant Alvin Huff for unlawful arrest in deprivation of Plaintiff Lozano's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Salvador Lozano against Defendant Alvin Huff.

4. On Plaintiff David Aragonez's claim for relief against Defendant Alvin Huff for unlawful arrest in deprivation of Plaintiff Aragonez's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff David Aragonez against Defendant Alvin Huff.

5. On Plaintiff Salvador Lozano's claim for relief against Defendant Alvin Huff for excessive force in deprivation of Plaintiff Lozano's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Alvin Huff against Plaintiff Salvador Lozano.

6. On Plaintiff David Aragonez's claim for relief against Defendant Alvin Huff for excessive force in deprivation of Plaintiff Aragonez's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Alvin Huff and against Plaintiff David Aragonez.

7. On Plaintiff Salvador Lozano's claim for relief against Defendant Peter Recatto for unlawful detention in deprivation of Plaintiff Lozano's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Peter Recatto and against Plaintiff Salvador Lozano.

8. On Plaintiff David Aragonez's claim for relief against Defendant Peter Recatto for unlawful detention in deprivation of Plaintiff Aragonez's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Peter Recatto against Plaintiff David Aragonez.

9. On Plaintiff Salvador Lozano's claim for relief against Defendant Peter Recatto for unlawful arrest in deprivation of Plaintiff Lozano's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Peter Recatto against Plaintiff Salvador Lozano.

10. On Plaintiff David Aragonez's claim for relief against Defendant Peter Recatto for unlawful arrest in deprivation of Plaintiff Aragonez's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Peter Recatto against Plaintiff David Aragonez.

11. On Plaintiff Salvador Lozano's claim for relief against Defendant Peter Recatto for excessive force in deprivation of Plaintiff Lozano's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Peter Recatto against Plaintiff Salvador Lozano.

12. On Plaintiff David Aragonez's claim for relief against Defendant Peter Recatto for excessive force in deprivation of Plaintiff Aragonez's Fourth Amendment rights, judgment is entered in favor of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.