Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kuoha v. Equifirst Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 24, 2009

SAMUEL AND DANA KUOHA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EQUIFIRST CORPORATION; HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL; ETS SERVICES, LLC; AND DOES 1-10, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hayes, Judge

ORDER

On May 20, 2009, Plaintiffs Samuel Kuoha and Dana Kuoha filed a Complaint and Plaintiff Samuel Kuoha filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. # 1-2). On July 8, 2009, the Court denied the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. # 3). The Court stated that this case would be closed unless Plaintiffs either paid the requisite $350 filing fee, or each submitted a more detailed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. # 3 at 2).

On July 16, 2009, Defendant Equifirst Corporation filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint.*fn1 (Doc. # 9). Also on July 16, 2009, Defendants Homecomings Financial and ETS Services, LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. # 10).

On July 21, 2009, Plaintiffs paid the $350 filing fee. (Doc. # 13).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than August 17, 2009, Plaintiff may file a response to Equifirst Corporation's Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. # 9) and Homecomings Financial and ETS Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 10). No later than August 24, 2009, Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiffs' response. There will be no oral argument or hearing on the motions.

WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.