Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Benham v. Aurora Loan Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 28, 2009

AYISHA BENHAM, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES; BNC MORTGAGE INC.; ROBERT E WEISS, INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; UNITED HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION; ASAD ZAFARI; KEITH HOUSTEAD; AND DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Judge Samuel Conti

STIPULATION BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT [LOCAL CIVIL RULE 6-1(A)] Complaint Filed: May 11, 2009 Trial Date: None

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ayisha Benham ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Aurora Loan Services LLC ("Aurora") (collectively "the Parties"), through their attorneys of record, that under the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Rule 6-1(a), in order to avoid any dispute concerning the validity of service of both the initial complaint and the amended complaint, the Parties hereby stipulate that Aurora shall have until July 31, 2009, to respond to Plaintiff's amended complaint.

It is so stipulated.

DATED: July 15, 2009

IT IS SO ORDERED

20090728

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.