UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
July 28, 2009
BANK OF THE WEST, PLAINTIFF,
UBS AG; UBS SECURITIES, LLC; UBS LIMITED; JAMES GIBBONS; AND DOES 1-10, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel United States District Judge
ORDER EXTENDING DATE TO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Court on June 18, 2009; (collectively "Defendants") removed the action on July 17, 2009; standing order that motions to dismiss shall not be filed before the initial Case Management Conference 8 except by leave of Court; and that it will be most efficient for the Court and the parties to resolve BOTW's remand motion before 11 addressing a motion to dismiss;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the date for Defendants to respond to the Complaint should be extended to 10 days after defendants are served with a ruling on BOTW's forthcoming motion to remand. This Stipulation is without prejudice to, and does not waive, defendant UBS Limited's objections to personal jurisdiction in this action.
WHEREAS, plaintiff Bank of the West ("BOTW") filed this action in San Francisco Superior
WHEREAS, defendants UBS AG; UBS Securities, LLC; UBS Limited; and James Gibbons
WHEREAS, Defendants intend to move to dismiss the action, but are mindful of the Court's
WHEREAS, BOTW intends to move to remand the action to State Court, and the parties believe
Based upon the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for defendants UBS AG; UBS Securities, LLC; UBS Limited; and James Gibbons to respond to the Complaint is extended. Defendants shall have until ten days after being served with the Court's ruling on BOTW's forthcoming motion to remand to move to dismiss or otherwise respond.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.