Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McDougald v. Ramar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 29, 2009

CARIS LYNN MCDOUGALD PLAINTIFF,
v.
MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT OFF CALENDAR OFFICERS RAMAR AND CAMBPELL, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT

(Document 37)

ORDER TAKING MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiff Caris Lynn McDougald ("Plaintiff"), appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, filed the instant civil rights action on February 19, 2008.

On July 1, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to interrogatories. Plaintiff specifically seeks responses to Interrogatory Number 1, which requests information regarding citizen complaints filed against Defendants. A hearing is set for July 31, 2009.

On July 16, 2009, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition in which they acknowledge that their late responses waived any objections. Defendants further state that they have served amended answers to both disputed sets of interrogatories in which Interrogatory Number 1 is answered without objection. Defendants have also provided Plaintiff with Exhibit A to each set of answers, which was previously omitted due to clerical oversight.

Defendants' further responses appear to have resolved the matter. The Court therefore VACATES and hearing and DENIES the motion as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090729

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.