Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Noor v. Martell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 29, 2009

MARVIN DEAN NOOR, PETITIONER,
v.
M. MARTELL, WARDEN (A) RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In view of the district court's July 2, 2009 order, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to answer petitioner's claims within thirty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents not already in the record that are relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; and

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed.

20090729

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.