The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). The Court screened Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and found that it states cognizable claims against Defendants Baer, Valdez, Buenos, Lee, Ponce and Purvis for use of excessive force and deliberate indifference to threat to safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for retaliating against Plaintiff for exercising his rights under the First Amendment. Plaintiff's complaint also states cognizable claims against Defendant Adams, Junious, Di Viaga, and callow for deliberate indifference to a threat to Plaintiff's safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment..*fn1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007); Alvarez v. Hill, 518 F.3d 1152, 1157-58 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: BAER VALDEZ BUENOS LEE PONCE PURVIS ADAMS JUNIOUS DI VIAGA CALLOW
2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff tEN USM-285 forms, tEN summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed February 2, 2009.
3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the Court with the following documents:
b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and
c. Eleven copies of the endorsed complaint filed February 2, 2009.
4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.
5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.