Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rotroff v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 2, 2009

DENIS K. ROTROFF, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JIM ROBINSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Denis K. Rotroff ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against defendants McClain, Robinson, Dieke, Rabout, Roger and Mendoza ("Defendants") and is scheduled for trial commencing December 7, 2009.

Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants are each to file a written response indicating whether a court settlement conference would be beneficial in resolving this action. If both parties agree, the Court will issue a further scheduling order setting this matter for settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge or District Judge from the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090802

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.