The opinion of the court was delivered by: John F. Walter, U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person August 3 2009
x WITH COUNSEL Mark A. Byrne / Jennifer L. Derwin
x GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding of x GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Exporting and Causing to Be Exported National Security Controlled Items Without a License in violation of 50 U.S.C. §1705(a),(c);15 C.F.R. §§ 736.2, 764.2, 774 Supp. 1, 738 Supp. 1 [cts 1-2] as charged in the Two-Count Indictment filed on February 6, 2009
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, William Chi-Wai Tsu, is hereby committed on Counts 1 and 2 of the Two-Count Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 40 months. This term consists of 40 months on each of Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment, to be served
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years. This term consists of three years on each of Counts 1 and 2, such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $200, ...