Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Correa v. McGuiness

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 4, 2009

VICTOR MANUEL CORREA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN MCGUINESS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

On November 17, 2008, findings and recommendations were issued recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of no opposition to defendants Deadman and Walker's motion for summary judgment. On January 27, 2009, the assigned district judge adopted that recommendation and dismissed this action. Judgment was entered accordingly. Since then, plaintiff has filed several requests inquiring into the status of this action and seeking clarification as to why it was dismissed. As previously stated, this action was dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b).

The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by plaintiff in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

So ordered.

20090804

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.