Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

O'Neal v. Kramer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 4, 2009

WALTER BRENNAN O'NEAL, PETITIONER,
v.
M.C. KRAMER, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

On June 2, 2009, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." In addition, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." One sanction that may be opposed is dismissal of the action.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, petitioner file and serve his opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this order will result in an order dismissing the action.

20090804

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.