Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mahajan v. Kumar

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 5, 2009

AMIT MAHAJAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SANGEETA KUMAR (AKA SANGEETA KUMARI), ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

In this action for damages, defendants Sangeeta Kumar, Rajendra Kumar, Rajnesh Kumar, and Vijma Kumar have noticed a motion for summary judgment or partial summary adjudication as to them only. The matter was scheduled for oral argument to be held August 10, 2009. The Court has reviewed Defendants' motion, Plaintiff's opposition and Defendants' reply. The court has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of August 10, 2009, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of August 10, 2009, the Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090805

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.