Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Weltman v. Ortho Mattress

August 6, 2009

LEO WELTMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ORTHO MATTRESS, INC., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated, moves to consolidate the above identified action with a related action, Thomas v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., Case No. 09cv0975 JM(WMc). The only Defendant in both actions, Ortho Mattress Inc., does not oppose the motion to consolidate but requests a 90 day extension of time to complete discovery. The court denies the motion to consolidate without prejudice because Thomas seeks to represent a class of employees including both Salespersons and Store Managers whereas Weltman seeks to represent a class consisting of Salespersons only. As the two actions seek to represent two different classes, the motion is denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs may renew the motion to consolidate following a hearing on class certification.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090806

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.