Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

California Dep't of Water Resources v. Powerex Corp.

August 11, 2009

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
POWEREX CORP., A CANADIAN CORPORATION, DBA POWEREX ENERGY CORP., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

On August 7, 2009, Plaintiff filed an ex parte request to continue the September 4, 2009, initial expert disclosure date, to September 18, 2009, asserting that good cause justifies the continuance. The good cause issue will not be reached but the continuance is granted since it is unclear why this continuance is disputed. Further, the prescribed rebuttal expert disclosure presently scheduled on or before October 5, 2009, is changed as follows: Any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) shall be filed on or before October 19, 2009.

20090811

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.