Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McClelland v. City of Modesto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 12, 2009

SUE MCCLELLAND, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF MODESTO, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, ROBERT HUNT, STEVE HOEK, PATRICK CRANE, OFFICER MCGILL, OFFICER GILLESPIE, OFFICER RAMAR, SARGEANT YOUNG AND ROY WASDEN, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 17, 2009, AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

On July 13, 2009, defendants City of Modesto, et al.("Defendants") noticed for a motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Sue McClelland ("Plaintiff") as to all defendants except County of Stanislaus. Defendant County of Stanislaus separately noticed a motion to dismiss on the same day. Both matters were scheduled for oral argument to be held August 17, 2009. The Court has reviewed Defendants' motions, Plaintiff's opposition, Defendants' responses, and related filings. The court has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of August 17, 2009, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of August 17, 2009, the Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090812

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.