UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 13, 2009
ONALD S. WILSON, PLAINTIFF,
JACK IN THE BOX, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, KOBRA ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DBA JACK IN THE BOX, HARRIET J. TASOFF, TRUSTEE OF THE TASOFF REVOCABLE TRUST, AND DOES ONE THROUGH FIFTY, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge
AMENDED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
Plaintiff RONALD S. WILSON and Defendants JACK IN THE BOX, INC., KOBRA ASSOCIATES, INC., dba JACK IN THE BOX, and HARRIET TASOFF, Trustee of the TASOFF REVOCABLE TRUST (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The Parties have entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and General release in this matter whereby they have resolved all claims and agreed to the dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice, each party to bear attorney fees and costs as set forth in the Confidential Settlement Agreement.
2. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request the Court to dismiss this action with prejudice.
Dated: August 10, 2009
SINGLETON LAW GROUP Jason K. Singleton, Richard E. Grabowski, Attorneys for Plaintiff, RONALD S. WILSON
Dated: August 11, 2009
ACKERMAN & KEVORKIAN Kevin B. Kevorkian, Attorney for Defendants JACK IN THE BOX INC. and HARRIET TASOFF, Trustee of the TASOFF REVOCABLE TRUST
Steve Colgate, Attorney for Defendant KOBRA ASSOCIATES, INC.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Having considered the parties' Amended Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and for good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. The action WILSON v. JACK IN THE BOX INC., et al., Case Number 2:08-CV- 2577 MCE EFB, is dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.