IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 17, 2009
RUSSELL DILBECK, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
On October 9, 2008, petitioner filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #3). On November 19, 2008, respondent filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #6). By order June 2, 2009, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why his action should not be dismissed for failure to respond to respondent's motion to dismiss. On June 9, 2009, petitioner filed a "Notice of Change of Address," and the order to show cause was re-served on petitioner on June 11, 2009. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.