The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
After reviewing the parties' Joint Status Report, the Court makes the following Pretrial Scheduling Order.
All named Defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown.
II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown.
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 29 U.S.C. section 1001 et seq. Jurisdiction and venue are not contested.
This case is governed by ERISA, therefore, all evidence for trial will be limited to the administrative record. The parties may move to admit evidence outside the administrative record. Defendants shall provide Plaintiff a copy of the entire administrative record within 60 days of the date of this Pretrial Scheduling Order. The filing of the written administrative record shall be filed not later than March 25, 2010.
V. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than April 29, 2010. The parties are responsible for ensuring that all motions are filed to allow for proper notice of the hearing under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Local Rules. Available hearing dates may be obtained by calling Stephanie Deutsch, Courtroom Deputy Clerk, at (916) 930-4207.
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule 78-230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions with the following additions:
(a) The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
(b) When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
Failure to comply with Local Rule 78-230(c), as modified by this Order, may be deemed consent to the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily. Further, failure to timely oppose a summary judgment motion*fn1 may result in the granting of that motion if the movant shifts the burden to the ...