IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
August 18, 2009
LARY W. GREMP, PLAINTIFF,
A.M. SARAH LITTLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE DISCOVERY [Civil Local Rules 7-11, 16-1]; [Proposed] ORDE SETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2009 AT 9:00
Date: September 11, 2009
Dept: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Trial Date November 9, 2009 Action Filed: May 2, 2008 respectfully request that the court enter an Order continuing for one week the motion for COME NOW the State Defendants, Patrick Taylor and Glenn Van Schaack, and summary judgment that is now filed contemporaneously with this motion. The State Defendants are noticing their motion for summary judgment with a hearing date of September 11, 2009, pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Preparation Order of December 22, 2008 (Docket No. 63). The moving parties note that the order requires that the hearing be noticed for 35 days from date of filing and have complied with the order. However, the counsel for State Defendants is required to appear at that same date and time in the matter of Parker v. Nishiyama, Case No. C-08-4750-CRB (No. Dist. Calif.). The appearance in the Parker matter, a motion to dismiss, was previously set by counsel for co-defendants.
Counsel have conferred concerning the dates. Plaintiff's counsel, Jordan Stanzler, agrees with the requested change. This change requires no alteration of the other dates.
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES THE COURT MAY MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
The Court has the authority to modify the Case Management schedule. Civil L.R. 16-2(d).
Dated: August 7, 2009
The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both sides will be heard on September 4, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.
9:00 a.m. Neither motion will be heard on September 18, 2009.
HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.