Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brady v. Rip Curl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 20, 2009

JAMES W. BRADY ET AL
v.
RIP CURL, INC. ET AL

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Margaret M. Morrow

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER

Local Rule 83-2.3.1 provides:

Any person who is not otherwise eligible for admission to practice before this Court, but who is a member in good standing of, and eligible to practice before, the bar of any United States Court, or of the highest court of any State, Territory or Insular Possession of the United States, who is of good moral character, and who has been retained to appear before this Court, may, upon written application and in the discretion of the Court, be permitted to appear and participate pro hac vice in a particular case.

On June 9, 2009, a reminder to complete and return the application along with a filing fee was issued to counsel Donald L. Dennison.

The court has not received counsel's Pro Hac Vice Application. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before September 2, 2009 why counsel's appearance should not be stricken and plaintiff substituted in as Pro se. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. The court will consider the filing of the Pro Hace Vice Application and payment of fee as a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause.

20090820

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.