Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Meyer v. Schwarzenegger

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 21, 2009

KEVIN RUSSELL MEYER, PETITIONER,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 5, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion (Doc. 78) requesting the court to provide plaintiff with twenty blank witness subpoena forms. Plaintiff only states that he wants to prepare his witness list. The court is unsure as to the reason for the subpoena forms. Pursuant to the scheduling order filed on February 5, 2009, all pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 11, 2009. After that date, if appropriate, the court will provide a further scheduling order describing the procedures for plaintiff to obtain witnesses to appear at trial. At this time, it is premature for plaintiff to need to obtain witnesses for trial.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for twenty subpoenas (Doc. 78) is denied.

20090821

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.