IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 28, 2009
DANIEL HARVEY GRIDLEY, PETITIONER,
JAMES D. HARTLEY, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
On August 17, 2009, petitioner filed "objections" to the magistrate judge's order filed July 31, 2009, denying petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel. The court construes petitioner's "objections" as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 31, 2009, is affirmed.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.