UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 28, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LESLIE D. WESSON
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
RECOMMENDATION TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE PRIOR TO EXPIRATION DATE
On April 15, 1999, the above-named was sentenced to 156 months custody in the Bureau of Prisons to be followed by a term of Supervised Release for a period of 5 years. Special conditions included: Warrantless search; Financial disclosure and restrictions; Drug/alcohol treatment program; Cellular phone/pager restrictions and billing records disclosure; and Co-payment for treatment program. On September 19, 2000, Mr. Wesson's sentence was reduced to 96 months custody Bureau of Prisons. The term of Supervised Release and the special conditions remained the same. Supervision commenced on January 21, 2005.
SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE
Mr. Wesson has complied with all conditions and special conditions of Supervised Release, and has not been involved in any further criminal activities. It is the opinion of the probation officer that Mr. Wesson has derived maximum benefit from supervision and is not in need of continued supervision.
It is, therefore, respectfully recommended that Supervised Release in this case be terminated early.
cc: To be assigned AUSA (Pursuant to Rule 32, notice of proposed relief to the supervisee is being provided. If no objection is received from you within 14 days, the probation officer's Recomm endation and Prob 35-Order Term inating Supervised Release Prior to Expiration Date, will be submitted to the Court for approval.)
ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE PRIOR TO EXPIRATION DATE
On January 21, 2005, the above-named was placed on Supervised Release for a period of years. He has complied with the rules and regulations of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that he be discharged from supervision.
Dated: July 29, 2009
ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE PRIOR TO EXPIRATION DATE ORDER OF COURT is ordered that the supervised releasee be discharged from Supervised Release, and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.