UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
August 31, 2009
RUDOLPH THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC., DBA SPRINT, SPRINT PCS AND/OR NEXTEL AND DOES 1-50, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson A United States District Court Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT SPRINT SOLUTIONS, SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and INC.'S MOTION TO STAY CASE ACTION FILED: November 10, 2008
WHEREAS on November 10, 2008, Plaintiff Thomas filed his Class Action Complaint for Breach of Contract, Deceptive Practices, Unfair Business Practices, and Unjust Enrichment ("Complaint");
WHEREAS on July 28, 2009, Sprint Solutions ("Defendant") filed a Motion to Stay Case;
WHEREAS on August 24, 2009, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay;
WHEREAS Defendant noticed its motion to be heard on September 14, 2009;
WHEREAS due to the parties' schedules, including Plaintiff's counsel is currently scheduled to be out of town on a previously scheduled matter, the parties have agreed, subject to approval by the Court, to continue the current hearing date to the first mutually available date, September 28, 2009, at 9:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS this stipulation and order continuing the hearing for Defendant's Motion to Stay Case and Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Case will have no further impact on the schedule for this case;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant, subject to the approval of the Court, that:
1. The hearing on Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Case shall be continued to September 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.