IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 31, 2009
WILLIAM ROUSER, PLAINTIFF,
K. RUTHERFORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez U. S. District Court Judge
On July 31, 2009, plaintiff filed an opposition to the magistrate judge's order filed July 20, 2009, denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. The court construes plaintiff's opposition as a request for reconsideration.
Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 20, 2009, is affirmed.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.