Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harrington v. Creditors Specialty Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 31, 2009

DAVID HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CREDITORS SPECIALTY SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez U. S. District Court Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment came on regularly for hearing before the assigned magistrate judge on June 24, 2009. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On July 8, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 8, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Creditors Specialty Service, Inc. is GRANTED; and

3. Upon the plaintiff's filing of a voluntary dismissal of his supplemental state law invasion of privacy claim, judgment is entered in the amount of $5,439.00.

20090831

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.