Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Peters v. City of Huron

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 3, 2009

THEA MCKAY PETERS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF HURON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET

Defendant J.P. Richwine (incorrectly named as "R. Wine") has noticed for hearing and decision a motion for summary judgment. The matter is scheduled for hearing to be held on September 8, 2009. Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), the court has reviewed the moving papers and has determined that this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).

Additionally, Defendant Richwine is identified in the Docket as "R. Wine." The Clerk will be directed to change the Docket from "R. Wine" to "J.P. Richwine."

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The previously set hearing date of September 8, 2009, is VACATED, and the parties shall not appear at that time; as of September 8, 2009, the Court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter issue its decision; and

2. The Clerk will change "R. Wine" to "J.P. Richwine" on the Docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090903

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.