Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wilson v. Sisto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 4, 2009

KARLOS WILSON, PETITIONER,
v.
D.K. SISTO, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceedings pro se, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to petitioner's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(1)-(2).

On May 13, 2009, the court found that petitioner had failed to pay the required filing fee, 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court gave petitioner 30 days to submit the filing fee or in forma pauperis application. On July 21, 2009, the court granted petitioner an additional 30 days in which to comply.

The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not paid the required filing fee, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

20090904

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.