Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Watts v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 8, 2009

ROBERT WATTS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows U. S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On September 4, 2009*fn1 , defendants filed an ex parte application for order shortening time to hear their motion to compel discovery responses. They request a hearing on September 10, 2009, before the undersigned. Their request is based on the looming September 15, 2009 discovery cutoff, and that plaintiffs have refused to respond to discovery requests served on July 28, 2009.

This court will deny defendants' application due to their seemingly dilatory tactics in propounding discovery near the eve of the discovery deadline. Moreover, since there has not been a total failure to respond, the discovery motion requires the preparation of a joint statement of discovery disputes. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 37-251. There appears to be no time in which to put this document together.

If the district court grants defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order, defendants may place their motion on this court's calendar by filing a joint statement pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 37-251, five business days prior to the hearing.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' ex parte application to shorten time, filed September 4, 2009, is denied.

2. Defendants' motion to compel discovery responses, filed September 4, 2009, is vacated without prejudice.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.