UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 11, 2009
SCOTT M. WILLIAMS, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Napoleon A. Jones, Jr. United States District Judge
ORDER LIFTING STAY
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Scott M. Williams' Motion to Lift Stay. [Doc. No. 56.] On August 31, 2009, Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion. [Doc. No. 57.] The Court finds the Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1.d.1. See S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7.1.d.1 (2006).
A stay in the above-captioned action was entered May 8, 2007 on the joint stipulation of the parties. [Doc. No. 54.] The reason for the stay was a pending California state court action, Randall v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. BC 296369 (Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. County, filed May 27, 2003) ("Randall Action"), which asserted certain overlapping claims with the present action. The state court has now approved settlement of the Randall Action, effectively resolving the overlapping claims. (Mem. of P. & A. at 6.) Because the need for the stay has been obviated, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby GRANTED, the stay in this case is LIFTED, and the litigation in this action shall proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.