UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 15, 2009
SEVAN MINASIAN, PLAINTIFF,
FEDEX CORPORATION, AND ITS AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. James Larson United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROCESS ORDER SELECTING ADR
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) xMediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5)
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: x the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline
The parties request that the current Case Management Conference scheduled for October 14, 2009 be adjourned and that the parties contact the Court to set a new date once mediation has been scheduled.
DATED: September 11, 2009
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) x Mediation
Deadline for ADR session x 90 days from the date of this order. other
The Case Management conference scheduled for October 14, 2009 is continued and will be rescheduled after the mediation is scheduled. The parties will contact chambers to initiate rescheduling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.