Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Minasian v. Fedex Corp.

September 15, 2009

SEVAN MINASIAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FEDEX CORPORATION, AND ITS AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. James Larson United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROCESS ORDER SELECTING ADR

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) xMediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: x the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

other requested deadline

The parties request that the current Case Management Conference scheduled for October 14, 2009 be adjourned and that the parties contact the Court to set a new date once mediation has been scheduled.

DATED: September ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.