IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 15, 2009
STEVEN HYPOLITE, PLAINTIFF,
CALIFORNIA DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
On June 3, 2009, the court granted defendants' June 2, 2009 motion to vacate the scheduling order in light of defendants' pending motion for summary judgment. On June 9, 2009, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendants' motion to vacate, which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's June 3, 2009 order. Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 3, 2009, is affirmed.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.