Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re California Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 17, 2009

IN RE CALIFORNIA TITLE INSURANCE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jeffrey S. White

CLASS ACTION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT OF ALL ACTIONS PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY AND CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, on May 21, 2009, the Court issued an Order Granting Motion to Dismiss and Granting Leave to Amend (Docket No. 124); on July 6, 2009 (Docket No. 127);

August 19, 2009 by an Order of this Court (Docket No. 129); standing order regarding the length of legal memorandum and agreed by stipulation that Defendants may seek the Court's permission to expand the page limit for their Joint Motion to Dismiss to no more than 25 pages in length; presented to the Court (Docket No. 130);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint

WHEREAS, Defendants' time to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint was extended through and including

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs consented to Defendants' request to seek relief from the Court's

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2009 a Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Page Limit of Defendants' Joint Memorandum In Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss was

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2009 the Court Granted the Stipulation and Order Extending Page Limit of Defendants' Joint Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 131); 2009 (Docket No. 132 & 133);

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Defendant Old Republic International Corporation filed a separate Motion to Dismiss and supporting memoranda of points and authorities on August 19,

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Order Continuing Hearing and Setting Briefing Schedule, dated August 19, 2009, Plaintiffs' briefs in opposition to Defendants' motions to dismiss are due on September 18, 2009, and Defendants' reply briefs in further support of their motions to dismiss are due on September 25, 2009 (Docket No. 134);

for relief from the Court's standing order regarding the length of legal memoranda to be filed in support of or in opposition to any motion, to permit the filing of a memorandum of no more than submit papers in opposition to Defendants' motions to dismiss;

order to permit the filing of a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, not to exceed 25 pages in length, and to Plaintiffs' request for a five-day extension of time for Plaintiffs to submit papers in opposition to Defendants' motions to dismiss; met and conferred with Plaintiffs and requested a one-week extension of the time for Defendants to submit reply papers in further support of their motion to dismiss, so that Defendants have two 17 weeks from filing of Plaintiffs' opposition papers to submit reply papers instead of one week; and for Defendants to submit reply papers in further support of their motion to dismiss, so that Defendants have two weeks from the filing of Plaintiffs' opposition papers to submit reply papers;

respective counsel, and subject to Court approval, that (i) Plaintiffs may seek relief from the Court's standing order and, subject to Court approval and said relief being granted, Plaintiffs may file and serve a memorandum in opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss of no more 26 than 25 pages in length; (ii) Plaintiffs' time to file and serve their briefs in opposition to

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have met and conferred with Defendants on a request by Plaintiffs 25 pages in length and on Plaintiffs' request for a five-day extension of the time for Plaintiffs to

WHEREAS, Defendants consent to Plaintiffs' request for relief from this Court's standing

WHEREAS, given the need to coordinate among numerous Defendants, Defendants have

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs consent to Defendants' request for a one-week extension of the time

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and Old Republic International Corporation's Motion to Dismiss is extended from September 18, 2009 until September 23, 2009; and (iii) Defendants' time to file and serve reply briefs in further support of Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and Old Republic International Corporation's Motion to Dismiss is extended from September 25, 2009 4 until October 7, 2009.

The Court shall approve the stipulation. However, in order to ensure the Court has adequate time to consider the parties' briefs, the hearing set for October 16, 2009, is HEREBY CONTINUED to Friday, October 30, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED.

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20090917

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.