Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Burch v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 17, 2009

CHRISTOPHER H. BURCH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES A. HARTLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER VACATING HEARING SET FOR OCTOBER 30, 2009, AT 9:30 A.M. ON DEFENDANT DANIEL YOUNG SHIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docs. 25 and 28)

Opposition Deadline: 10/16/2009 Reply Deadline: 10/27/2009

Defendant Daniel Young Shin's motion to dismiss is set for hearing before the undersigned on October 30, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. The Court has reviewed the motion and finds it is appropriate for the motion to be submitted upon the record and briefs without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss set for October 30, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED;

2. Plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss is due on or before October 16, 2009; and

3. Defendant's reply, if any, is due on or before October 27, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090917

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.