Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States v. Jack
September 18, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARRISON ULRICH JACK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Frank C. Damrell, Jr. United States District Judge
UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT VANG PAO ORDER FROM THE INDICTMENT; MOTION
Plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), to dismiss the counts in the indictment filed June 14, 2007 as against defendant Vang PAO, solely, in the interests of justice. Based on the totality of the evidence in the case and the circumstances regarding defendant Vang PAO, the government believes, as a discretionary matter, that continued prosecution of defendant VANG PAO is no longer warranted.
Dated: September 18, 2009.
Based upon the motion of the United States, it is hereby ordered that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), all charges against defendant Vang PAO in the indictment filed June 14, 2007 are dismissed as against defendant Vang PAO solely. This order shall have no effect on the charges alleged against all remaining defendants in said indictment.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...