Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Coldani v. Hamm

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 18, 2009

RAYMOND COLDANI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JACK HAMM AND PATRICIA HAMM, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS LIMA RANCH/DAIRY, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge

ORDER

On September 9, 2008, defendants filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed August 26, 2008, granting plaintiff's motions to compel and denying defendants' motion for protective order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the August 26, 2008, order of the magistrate judge is affirmed. Therefore, pursuant to the magistrate judge's September 17, 2009, order, defendants shall pay the sanction award set forth therein within twenty days of the date of this order.

20090918

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.